Abstract

Compares the occult approach to the development of mystic consciousness with the Jungian approach. Occult sciences such as astrology and alchemy are rich in symbolism, but their basic principles have not, for the most part, been translated into scientific formulations. One exception is The Kybalion (1936) which specifies 7 principles that are believed to underlie all occult knowledge. Six axioms concerning the operations of the occult are derived from these principles that state how the teachings are to be used. In contrast, a person uses the Jungian method of active imagination to relate to his/her unconscious in a continuing dialog. The Jungian attempts union with the inner world with the aim of individuation and differentiation of consciousness, whereas the occultist has the aim of gaining power and fulfilling desires. Both orientations tend to be characterized by psychological inflation. It is suggested that there is a need to develop the capacity to function simultaneously in the mystical, the occult, and the critical-interpretative modes of consciousness, and a bridge between these modes of consciousness may be provided by Reichian methods.