Several extensive experimental studies of human/machine inter­actions wherein the human operators and the target machines are separated by distances of up to several thousand miles yield anom­alous results comparable in scale and character to those produced under conditions of physical proximity. The output distributions of random binary events produced by a variety of micro-electronic random and pseudorandom generators, as well as by a macroscopic random mechanical cascade, display small but replicable and statistically significant mean shifts correlated with the remote operators' pre-stated intentions, and feature cumulative achievement patterns similar to those of the corresponding local experiments. Individual operator effect sizes distribute normally, with the majority of partic­ipants contributing to the overall effect. Patterns of specific count populations are also similar to those found in the corresponding local experiments. The insensitivity of the size and details of these re­sults to intervening distance and time adds credence to a large database of precognitive remote perception experiments, and suggests that these two forms of anomaly may draw from similar mechanisms of information exchange between human consciousness and random physical processes.